Arkell v Pressdram..

.. A libel action brought against the satirical magazine Private Eye, which became a classic piece of Eye-lore, mainly due to the following exchange of legal correspondence:

Solicitor’s Letter (from Goodman Derrick & Co.)

“We act for Mr Arkell who is Retail Credit Manager of Granada TV Rental Ltd. His attention has been drawn to an article appearing in the issue of Private Eye dated 9th April 1971 on page 4. The statements made about Mr Arkell are entirely untrue and clearly highly defamatory. We are therefore instructed to require from you immediately your proposals for dealing with the matter. Mr Arkell’s first concern is that there should be a full retraction at the earliest possible date in Private Eye and he will also want his costs paid. His attitude to damages will be governed by the nature of your reply.”

Response from Private Eye

“We acknowledge your letter of 29th April referring to Mr J. Arkell. We note that Mr Arkell’s attitude to damages will be governed by the nature of our reply and would therefore be grateful if you would inform us what his attitude to damages would be, were he to learn that the nature of our reply is as follows: fuck off.”

[No further correspondence]

3 thoughts on “Arkell v Pressdram..

  1. Pingback: Please advise on action - The Consumer Forums
  2. Pingback: Consumer Credit Act Agreements - Page 842 - The Consumer Forums
  3. Pingback: After Atos Receive 2nd Cease & Desist Letter From Atos

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s